Skip to content
Home » Blog » Simulated Phishing Exercises

Simulated Phishing Exercises

    In this article we will be diving deep about this interesting topic Simulated Phishing Exercises.

Now, let us see what it means !

Performing Phishing Exercises


– A phishing test, also known as simulated phishing, is when a company sends its own employees misleading emails that are similar to malicious emails to see how they will react to phishing and other similar email attacks. The emails themselves frequently serve as a type of instruction, but such testing is typically conducted in conjunction with earlier instruction and is frequently followed by further training components. This is particularly true for people who “fail” by opening email attachments, visiting linked websites, or entering login information.
    – Phishing is the typical first step in a cyberattack on a company. The risk is increasing as cybercriminals create highly tailored emails using publicly available data for an advanced tactic called spear phishing.
    – Training in a controlled atmosphere is the most efficient strategy to defend your company from phishing assaults.
    – My heart sank when I heard last year that workers at Tribune Publishing newspapers (including the Hartford Courant) that had been hit by layoffs and buyouts had been sent phishing emails that falsely promised bonuses of $5,000 to $10,000.
    – I can only speculate as to how the journalists felt.
    – Simulated phishing exercises, in which employees are given emails that appear to be from hackers in an effort to assess and raise cybersecurity awareness, are becoming more and more popular at businesses of all sizes across the world. Depending on how the leadership handles them, these exercises can either increase or decrease trust among the workforce.

Methods To Perform


– There are numerous ways to conduct this testing.
        – To do this, several providers provide web-hosted platforms, and others offer restricted free “test” campaigns.
        – More technical organizations may host and manage their own testing thanks to a large variety of freely accessible open-source solutions.
        – Such testing is now a built-in feature of some email services.
    – In order for simulations to work, email gateways, anti-virus software, and web proxies frequently need to be whitelisted in order for email to get to user desktops and devices and be acted upon. This is because organizations typically have a set of multi-layered defenses in place to prevent actual malicious phishing.

Why Do We Need ?


    – The idea that effective staff training is essential and that technical safeguards alone cannot thwart all harmful email attacks is widely accepted in the IT security community.
    – Simulated phishing enables the accurate evaluation of employee compliance and, when used frequently, may track changes in user behavior.
    – Several government organizations advise phishing simulation and frequently offer instructions for formulating such regulations. When it comes to offering workers regular exercise in appropriate behavior, phishing simulations are sometimes compared to fire drills.

Credible and non-harmful


– If you’re thinking, “How could Tribune have thought it would be a good idea to dangle bonuses in a false phishing email?” They were asking themselves: “What kind of email idea is so alluring that it will put our staff’s cybersecurity training to the test?” It’s a fine question to ask, but it just addresses half of the issue.
    – Hackers frequently use convincing phishing emails that appear to be from a boss or coworker, and the text is created to cause recipients to click without thinking. Hackers attempt to elicit an emotional response so that these telltale signs—such as misspelt words or odd wording—do not stand out in these emails.
    – They frequently accomplish this by using salaciousness or urgency (claiming that an urgent response is required to prevent disaster) (sending what appears to be a link to salaries for the whole company sent in error).
    – Simulated phishing emails must employ these same techniques in order to be a legitimate test of cybersecurity awareness. However, managers must also consider whether anyone on the team might be harmed by the email’s content.
    – It’s critical to pause and consider the reactions of the staff after the trick is exposed. Will they consider this to have been a positive start in increasing their cybersecurity awareness? Or will they suspect fraud?
    – A really smart hacker would recognize that claiming to provide bonuses to underpaid journalists could be beneficial. Hackers customize their phishing emails to the institutions they target. In that sense, the phishing scam emails from Tribune Publishing were plausible.
    – Other stories, on the other hand, might have been equally compelling without coming out as so callously mocking at the end.

Evaluate Outcomes Collectively


    – When the phishing exercise is over and the results are in, it is best to refrain from naming specific people who fell for the phishing spoof in the media. Rather, it’s beneficial to reveal the overall proportion of workers who would have been duped by the attack had it been true. Without highlighting or berating specific workers, the team can monitor their overall success.
    – When the findings of a phishing exercise are handled discreetly, some courageous employees are likely to come forward willingly to offer their account of how the exercise succeeded in fooling them. Allow them to share their experience without passing judgement.
    – Others may be able to identify times when their cybersecurity awareness may be compromised if they can explain what was going through their minds when they saw the email.

Be feisty, leaders


   
    – If company executives are among the people who opened the fake phishing link, it can be very effective if they are willing to talk about it. I did it by myself.
    – In addition to running simulated phishing drills for the clients of Kelser Corp. also uses simulated phishing to regularly test our own staff. I was duped in one instance. I made everyone else who did the same thing feel better about it by being open and admitting that I had clicked the link.
    – I was able to demonstrate that our use of simulated phishing is not done to harm anyone’s feelings.
    – We do it to hone our perceptions so that we can cooperate to combat cybercrime. We do it because we all need to improve our skills because anyone may be phished, even the CEO of an IT company who has worked in this field for close to 40 years.

Conclusion


   That’s all about the Simulating the Phishing Exercises. After reading this essay, I hope you found it enjoyable and learned something new. We have learned what is phishing, methods to perform, why do we need to perform the exercises, impacts and outcomes of it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.